Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute

[Content protected for Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute Standard subscribers only. Please subscribe to view site content.]

We have all witnessed the trend of some sovereign wealth funds raising private capital or creating sovereign wealth enterprises to act as an investment manager for private funds.  This article is to bring some clarity on why a number of funds are doing this.  With Mubadala raising $1.85 billion in medium term notes, Temasek Holdings multiple debt raises in denominated in multiple currencies, and Mumtalakat Holdings bond offering, it shows that SWFs are using their assets, not just their cash as an investment.

First off, most SWFs that are raising capital are the types of sovereign wealth funds that take large stakes in companies.  In addition, SWFs that hold large portions of their domestic industry would be the type of funds to engage in this behavior.  We most likely would not see the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority or the Norwegian GPFG raise capital or take on bank loans.  In some instances, SWFs experience shrinkage of money flows from their respective government; money in the private markets backed by SWF assets can increase their stability and investment performance.[Content protected for Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute Standard subscribers only. Please subscribe to view site content.]

[Content protected for Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute Standard subscribers only. Please subscribe to view site content.]

VNS states that “state equity in former State-owned enterprises that have been equitised remains poorly managed due to the overlapping authority of ministries and provincial governments, State Capital Investment Corporation deputy director Le Song Lai told a conference last week on management of state assets.

‘Even in equitised firms, ministries and provincial authorities still intervene in management, which undermines corporate governance and results in a lack of professionalism and accountability,’ Lai said.

The authorized representative of State capital in many of these enterprises has not been identified, said Tran Tien Cuong, director of the enterprise policy research department of Central Institute for Economic Management, with the result that a number of agencies, organisations and individuals were involved simultaneously in exercising State ownership rights. Too often, these agencies were exercising rights that, in fact, belonged to another agency, Cuong said.”

read more: VNS

[Content protected for Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute Standard subscribers only. Please subscribe to view site content.]

[Content protected for Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute Standard subscribers only. Please subscribe to view site content.]

[Content protected for Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute Standard subscribers only. Please subscribe to view site content.]