Connect with us

Institutional Investors: Winners and Losers if Trump Wins


Today is Super Tuesday, and it seems Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton are the clear benefactors of these delegates. The mudslinging battles for U.S. party nominations are intense as the stakes grow higher. One of the goals of SWFI is to provide high-level insight and intelligence on how political events can impact asset owners, whether they are public pensions, sovereign wealth funds, or endowments. By focusing just on the Republican race for the party nomination, one can see Donald J. Trump, a New York City developer and reality TV star (NBC’s The Apprentice), amassing a pool of delegates, broadly across the United States, except for U.S. Senator Ted Cruz picking up Texas and Oklahoma. The self-funded candidate Trump continues to lead in many polls. From analyzing various financial media, there is some consensus that Trump’s populist appeal and policy uncertainties could provide headwinds for large multi-national companies.

On the fixed income side, U.S. Treasuries would benefit, as uncertainty, especially in global trade and other policies, would cause more foreign institutional investors to flock to safety.

Here are some themes that institutional investors may want to consider in the case of a Trump presidency:


1.) U.S. Stocks with Little International Exposure
Portfolio managers could anticipate a long-term increase in domestic capital expenditures from U.S. producers in the areas of industrial manufacturing. If the U.S. produced more goods and services, employment in the US could increase. However, if the U.S. reversed too many trade flows, the U.S. dollar could become too strong, thus negatively impacting exports. In effect, global trade may slowdown. Japanese and Latin American equities would be greatly impacted if trade flows slowed.

In addition, Trump as a candidate supports lowering the U.S. corporate tax rate and changing in repatriation rules, which would bring more capital back to U.S. shores. This would be a boon for U.S. companies.

2.) The Safe Bet – U.S. Real Estate and Treasuries
Many wealth funds and pensions view U.S. core real estate as a store of value, with an inflation hedge. Cash flowing real estate would most likely be in even higher demand, as institutional investors would want to park more capital in the United States.

On the fixed income side, U.S. Treasuries would benefit, as uncertainty, especially in global trade and other policies, would cause more foreign institutional investors to flock to safety.


Quicken China’s Move Toward a Consumption-Based Economy
A Trump administration may expedite China’s transformation into a consumer-based economy by negating and challenging large trade deals with the United States. If trade decreased, it could significantly reduce China’s foreign reserves which are already decreasing at the moment. However, China’s State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) could counter by depreciating the Renminbi even lower.


1.) Hedge Funds Closing
If Trump were to become U.S. President, more U.S. hedge funds could possibly shutter, some transforming into family offices. Hedge fund owners and managers could be negatively affected by Trump’s tax plan. Trump said to the media back in October 2015 that hedge fund guys are “getting away with murder” by “paying nothing” in taxes. Trump would get rid of carried interest for “speculative partnerships that do not grow businesses or create jobs.”

2.) Big Pharma to Take a Hit
Large pharmaceutical manufacturers might be at risk here as Trump has stated numerous times that he intends to negotiate with drug companies. Medicare is the biggest purchaser of drugs and is prohibited by U.S. law from seeking better prices. Drug companies such as Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Roche, Abbott Laboratories, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly and Bristol-Myers Squibb would be at risk in their stock prices.

3.) Longer Period of Low Oil Prices
According to the latest government figures, the United States produced an average of 9.43 million barrels a day in 2015. The price of oil would probably remain low, as the Keystone Pipeline would probably go through. Furthermore, the U.S. oil boom would continue to grow, thus negatively impacting the finances of OPEC member nations.

As the U.S. Election Day draws near, institutional investors should anticipate how each final candidate could impact their portfolio.

The views in this article are expressed by Michael Maduell.
Michael Maduell is President of the SWFI.

Concerns Raised at Potential BlackRock Takeover of CalPERS’ Private Equity

The California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) has been analyzing options on what to do with its massive US$ 26 billion private equity program. The pension system has embraced the mantra of reducing cost, reducing complexity and reducing risk, the hallmark of its program called “INVO 2020”. CalPERS also wants less, but more strategic relationships with external money managers. At one point, CalPERS was contemplating increasing its direct investment staff to model Canadian pension funds such as Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (CPPIB), OMERS and the Ontario Teachers’ Pension plan. The pendulum has begun to swing the other way as reported earlier by SWFI research staff.

[ Content protected for Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute Standard subscribers only. Please subscribe to view content. ]

Continue Reading

CDP Signs €1.7 Billion Infrastructure Loan Agreement with Atlantia Group

Cassa depositi e prestiti S.p.A. (CDP) and Atlantia Group’s Autostrade per l’Italia (ASPI) have signed a €1.7 billion loan contract dedicated to upgrading motorways in Italy under concession to ASPI. €1.1 billion will come in the form of a term loan with a 10-year tenure, with the remaining €600 million wrapped up in a five-year revolving loan.

[ Content protected for Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute Standard subscribers only. Please subscribe to view content. ]

Continue Reading

Sovereign Funds Commit to Integrating Climate-Related Risks at One Planet Summit

Representatives from a number of sovereign wealth funds who collectively govern over US$ 2 trillion in assets came together at the One Planet Summit at the Élysée Palace in Paris in order to discuss what public asset owners can do to incorporate climate change-related risks and opportunities into investment considerations.

The newly formed committee – called the One Planet Sovereign Wealth Fund Working Group – includes as its founding members the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA), Kuwait Investment Authority (KIA), Qatar Investment Authority (QIA), Norges Bank Investment Management (manager of Norway’s Government Pension Fund Global), Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund (PIF), and the New Zealand Superannuation Fund.

[ Content protected for Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute Standard subscribers only. Please subscribe to view content. ]

Continue Reading


© 2008-2017 Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute. All Rights Reserved. Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute ® and SWFI® are registered trademarks of the Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute. Other third-party content, logos and trademarks are owned by their perspective entities and used for informational purposes only. No affiliation or endorsement, express or implied, is provided by their use. All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. Registration on or use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms of use agreement which includes our privacy policy. Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute (SWFI) is a global organization designed to study sovereign wealth funds, pensions, endowments, superannuation funds, family offices, central banks and other long-term institutional investors in the areas of investing, asset allocation, risk, governance, economics, policy, trade and other relevant issues. SWFI facilitates sovereign fund, pension, endowment, superannuation fund and central bank events around the world. SWFI is a minority-owned organization.