Ontario Dreams of Creating Two Mega Pension Funds
Upon hearing the news, some pensioners and labor groups in Ontario are pushing back. Many of the pension plans are underfunded and believe mashing them together won’t fix insolvency issues. In addition, some pensioners may have to contribute more. On the other hand, some people agree that consolidation can work, especially if you look at OMERS and OTPP’s investment returns compared to smaller pensions.
In the past four years, many Canadian public fund investors began modifying investment strategies to cope with a low-yield environment, thus embracing alternatives like real estate, infrastructure, and private equity. Higher interest rates have been scuttled away with easy money policy actions by the European Central Bank and the Federal Reserve.
Pension expenses are exerting unduly strain on government finances.
A pooling of assets, similar to what OMERS and OTPP accomplished could be a model to reduce administrative costs and have stronger purchasing power when it comes to finding investment managers or assets. Investing in real estate and private equity, especially on a direct basis requires substantial in-house capabilities. Smaller public funds do not have the scale to develop these systems, thus relying more on consultants and external managers. In addition, smaller funds in Canada have been slow to make the change, due to the challenge of finding suitable alternative investments and monitoring asset performance.
Contact the writer or creator of this article or page.
Questions or comments: support(at)swfinstitute(dot)org
Follow on Twitter at @swfinstitute and @sovereignfunds
Learn, Attend and Network: Institutional Investor Events and Summits
Go Back: HOME: Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute