Connect with us

SWFs to External Managers, Not Just About Performance

Published

on

publicfundmonitor_exploringBottom line, if a fund manager is not performing in the long-run, meaning losing money or failing to at least meet the benchmark, there is a good chance the mandate will be terminated. Performance is usually the number one factor of how external managers are rated among public investors. It is hard to sell a non-performing manager to a board or council committee.

In the age of advanced financial products and services, external managers are going the distance to please their largest accounts. Good performance is not enough; money managers have been offering value-added services to their clients in terms of asset allocation, risk management, and knowledge sharing. In fact, many large asset managers and banks offer training to monetary authorities, sovereign wealth funds, and other long-term public investors. This willingness to share insight and processes increases business transparency.

Common Qualitative Factors Common Quantitative Factors
Client Service Performance
Firm Ownership Investment Style
Firm Growth Prospects Risk to Portfolio
Human Resources  
Investment Approach  
Business Risk Issues



Improved client servicing is paramount, especially in down markets. This is a major differentiating factor. Key deal breakers for external managers usually include a lack of consistent client communications. Public investors are under pressure from their boards on hitting their return targets, bad performance coupled with a flawed communication strategy is a recipe for being “black-listed”.

A change in key management or culture is also cause for external manager termination.

Official institutions and sovereign wealth funds will continue to award mandates, especially in areas where they lack resources to do it themselves. In 2000, the Central Bank of Brazil began to start using external managers when the bank had US$ 35 to 50 billion to allocate. The bank also has a program that works on a three-year performance cycle.

Last, many sovereign investors especially with passive mandates are concerned with performance consistency. Weighting return consistency would most likely be expected in fixed income or absolute return mandates. Investors like to look at the external manager’s convictions, investment processes, technology and adherence to the mandate.

SWFI First Read, September 19, 2018

Published

on

QIA Eyes Investment in Chinese Lender Lufax

The Qatar Investment Authority (QIA) is in talks about a possible investment into Shanghai-based Lufax, one of China’s largest online lenders. The seller of the possible stake is China’s Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. Ltd. Lufax’s official name is Shanghai Lujiazui International Financial Asset Exchange Co. Ltd.

Wealth Funds Back Hotpot Giant

[ Content protected for Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute Standard subscribers only. Please subscribe to view content. ]

Continue Reading

Japanese Government Capital Provides Initial Life for Texas Bullet Train

Published

on

Dallas-based Texas Central Partners, LLC is the developer of a proposed high-speed rail system, dubbed the Texas Bullet Train, between Dallas and Houston. Project costs are estimated between US$ 12 billion to US$ 15 billion. The developer secured US$ 300 million in project loans from Japan Overseas Infrastructure Investment Corporation for Transport & Urban Development (JOIN) and the Japan Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC). [ Content protected for Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute Standard subscribers only. Please subscribe to view content. ]

Continue Reading

DOJ Investing Tesla Over Musk Comments

Published

on

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is conducting a fraud investigation over Tesla as its CEO Elon Musk made public statements on twitter. This is a criminal probe. In addition, earlier, SWFI reported the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is conducting a civil inquiry into Elon Musk regarding his statements.

This all surrounds Musk tweeting in August that he was thinking of taking Tesla private and had “funding secured” for the transaction. Both government authorities are seeing if Musk misled investors and violated federal securities laws with his public statements.

Continue Reading

Popular

© 2008-2018 Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute. All Rights Reserved. Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute ® and SWFI® are registered trademarks of the Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute. Other third-party content, logos and trademarks are owned by their perspective entities and used for informational purposes only. No affiliation or endorsement, express or implied, is provided by their use. All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. Registration on or use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms of use agreement which includes our privacy policy. Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute (SWFI) is a global organization designed to study sovereign wealth funds, pensions, endowments, superannuation funds, family offices, central banks and other long-term institutional investors in the areas of investing, asset allocation, risk, governance, economics, policy, trade and other relevant issues. SWFI facilitates sovereign fund, pension, endowment, superannuation fund and central bank events around the world. SWFI is a minority-owned organization.