Connect with us

COUNTERPOINT: Why Long-Term Investing Can Be Dangerous




Got your attention?

Personally, I agree that, in general, large sovereign funds and pensions should invest for the long-term. There are scores of reasons why and thousands of papers produced by asset managers, think tanks and professors who believe so. Nearly every institutional investor with over US$ 100 billion in assets subscribes to the “long-term investor” philosophy. I also understand the issues with reinvestment risk as well as the ways to combat it like identifying intergenerational assets for the long-haul to prevent the risk of not finding another suitable investment that could give a similar risk-return profile.

Today, however, I feel like stirring the pot.

What are some risks to long-term investing?

A major risk that I see is that sometimes an investment could fail in producing the big expected payoff as forecasted. Will the Canary Wharf deal be a positive in the long-run for the Qatar Investment Authority (QIA) given the price paid and resources allocated? Incorrect expectations based on a shaky premise can lead to money being stuck in an underperforming asset (this is especially the case with sizable illiquid investments).

But institutional investors also need to examine some of the glaring examples of lousy deals where money has been tied up too long in non-performing, illiquid assets and the opportunity costs associated with these types of bets.


There has been a recent spat of deals in which sovereign wealth funds like Singapore’s GIC or a large Canadian pension like CPPIB have acquired significant positions in technology companies. Tech companies can go in and out of style. Rarely, tech companies get to the status of Google, IBM or Oracle. In April 2015, CPPIB and European private equity firm Permira, through its funds, signed a deal to acquire Redwood City-based Informatica Corporation, a provider of enterprise data integration software and services, for approximately US$ 5.3 billion. Insiders perceive vast potential for Informatica, billion dollar opportunities in four market areas such as cloud, big data, master data management and data security. However, there are business risks that a startup or resource-rich competitor could develop a technology or process that could severely impair Informatica’s revenues. One industry to watch for is cloud storage, as firms like Dropbox and Amazon are in a brutally competitive environment.

Political Risk in Infrastructure

Case in point, the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA), CPPIB, Allianz Capital Partners and others own Solveig Gas Norway AS, the second-biggest owner of Norway’s massive gas pipeline network. The investor group is in the center of a lawsuit against the government of Norway to reverse the unexpected deep tariff cut approved by Norway’s previous administration, led by former Norwegian Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg. Why do these institutional investors care about a tariff reduction? The current tariff will lower income by almost US$ 7 billion for the investor group.

Pursuing high returns in potentially-volatile countries can be dangerous. More than five years ago, institutional investors in the West were plowing money into Russia. Even the US$ 300 billion plus California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) formed a joint venture with real estate firm Hines in March 2013 to invest in Class A logistics and retail assets in Russia. The fund (Hines CalPERS Russia Long Term Hold Fund) had initial equity commitments of US$ 493 million. Today, the West has issued sanctions in Russia, while the rouble crashes over fallen oil prices and sanctions. Imagine, if a large Western pension or sovereign fund invested in a mega piece of infrastructure that had a 20-year investment horizon…

Clearly the benefits of a long term horizon are profuse and have been well documented. But institutional investors also need to examine some of the glaring examples of lousy deals where money has been tied up too long in non-performing, illiquid assets and the opportunity costs associated with these types of bets.

Elephantine asset owners are uniquely organized to be opportunistic with their allocations, and in certain instances sticking too closely to the “long-term” dogma can have negative long-term results on an institutional portfolio.

The views in this article are expressed by Michael Maduell.
Michael Maduell is President of the SWFI.

SWFI First Read, September 19, 2018



QIA Eyes Investment in Chinese Lender Lufax

The Qatar Investment Authority (QIA) is in talks about a possible investment into Shanghai-based Lufax, one of China’s largest online lenders. The seller of the possible stake is China’s Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. Ltd. Lufax’s official name is Shanghai Lujiazui International Financial Asset Exchange Co. Ltd.

Wealth Funds Back Hotpot Giant

[ Content protected for Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute Standard subscribers only. Please subscribe to view content. ]

Continue Reading

Japanese Government Capital Provides Initial Life for Texas Bullet Train



Dallas-based Texas Central Partners, LLC is the developer of a proposed high-speed rail system, dubbed the Texas Bullet Train, between Dallas and Houston. Project costs are estimated between US$ 12 billion to US$ 15 billion. The developer secured US$ 300 million in project loans from Japan Overseas Infrastructure Investment Corporation for Transport & Urban Development (JOIN) and the Japan Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC). [ Content protected for Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute Standard subscribers only. Please subscribe to view content. ]

Continue Reading

DOJ Investing Tesla Over Musk Comments



The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is conducting a fraud investigation over Tesla as its CEO Elon Musk made public statements on twitter. This is a criminal probe. In addition, earlier, SWFI reported the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is conducting a civil inquiry into Elon Musk regarding his statements.

This all surrounds Musk tweeting in August that he was thinking of taking Tesla private and had “funding secured” for the transaction. Both government authorities are seeing if Musk misled investors and violated federal securities laws with his public statements.

Continue Reading


© 2008-2018 Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute. All Rights Reserved. Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute ® and SWFI® are registered trademarks of the Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute. Other third-party content, logos and trademarks are owned by their perspective entities and used for informational purposes only. No affiliation or endorsement, express or implied, is provided by their use. All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. Registration on or use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms of use agreement which includes our privacy policy. Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute (SWFI) is a global organization designed to study sovereign wealth funds, pensions, endowments, superannuation funds, family offices, central banks and other long-term institutional investors in the areas of investing, asset allocation, risk, governance, economics, policy, trade and other relevant issues. SWFI facilitates sovereign fund, pension, endowment, superannuation fund and central bank events around the world. SWFI is a minority-owned organization.