Connect with us

COUNTERPOINT: Why Long-Term Investing Can Be Dangerous




Got your attention?

Personally, I agree that, in general, large sovereign funds and pensions should invest for the long-term. There are scores of reasons why and thousands of papers produced by asset managers, think tanks and professors who believe so. Nearly every institutional investor with over US$ 100 billion in assets subscribes to the “long-term investor” philosophy. I also understand the issues with reinvestment risk as well as the ways to combat it like identifying intergenerational assets for the long-haul to prevent the risk of not finding another suitable investment that could give a similar risk-return profile.

Today, however, I feel like stirring the pot.

What are some risks to long-term investing?

A major risk that I see is that sometimes an investment could fail in producing the big expected payoff as forecasted. Will the Canary Wharf deal be a positive in the long-run for the Qatar Investment Authority (QIA) given the price paid and resources allocated? Incorrect expectations based on a shaky premise can lead to money being stuck in an underperforming asset (this is especially the case with sizable illiquid investments).

But institutional investors also need to examine some of the glaring examples of lousy deals where money has been tied up too long in non-performing, illiquid assets and the opportunity costs associated with these types of bets.


There has been a recent spat of deals in which sovereign wealth funds like Singapore’s GIC or a large Canadian pension like CPPIB have acquired significant positions in technology companies. Tech companies can go in and out of style. Rarely, tech companies get to the status of Google, IBM or Oracle. In April 2015, CPPIB and European private equity firm Permira, through its funds, signed a deal to acquire Redwood City-based Informatica Corporation, a provider of enterprise data integration software and services, for approximately US$ 5.3 billion. Insiders perceive vast potential for Informatica, billion dollar opportunities in four market areas such as cloud, big data, master data management and data security. However, there are business risks that a startup or resource-rich competitor could develop a technology or process that could severely impair Informatica’s revenues. One industry to watch for is cloud storage, as firms like Dropbox and Amazon are in a brutally competitive environment.

Political Risk in Infrastructure

Case in point, the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA), CPPIB, Allianz Capital Partners and others own Solveig Gas Norway AS, the second-biggest owner of Norway’s massive gas pipeline network. The investor group is in the center of a lawsuit against the government of Norway to reverse the unexpected deep tariff cut approved by Norway’s previous administration, led by former Norwegian Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg. Why do these institutional investors care about a tariff reduction? The current tariff will lower income by almost US$ 7 billion for the investor group.

Pursuing high returns in potentially-volatile countries can be dangerous. More than five years ago, institutional investors in the West were plowing money into Russia. Even the US$ 300 billion plus California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) formed a joint venture with real estate firm Hines in March 2013 to invest in Class A logistics and retail assets in Russia. The fund (Hines CalPERS Russia Long Term Hold Fund) had initial equity commitments of US$ 493 million. Today, the West has issued sanctions in Russia, while the rouble crashes over fallen oil prices and sanctions. Imagine, if a large Western pension or sovereign fund invested in a mega piece of infrastructure that had a 20-year investment horizon…

Clearly the benefits of a long term horizon are profuse and have been well documented. But institutional investors also need to examine some of the glaring examples of lousy deals where money has been tied up too long in non-performing, illiquid assets and the opportunity costs associated with these types of bets.

Elephantine asset owners are uniquely organized to be opportunistic with their allocations, and in certain instances sticking too closely to the “long-term” dogma can have negative long-term results on an institutional portfolio.

The views in this article are expressed by Michael Maduell.
Michael Maduell is President of the SWFI.

SWFI First Read, January 19, 2018



RDIF Portfolio Company PhosAgro Raises Bond Issue

PhosAgro is a portfolio company of the Russian Direct Investment Fund (RDIF). The company price out a US$ 500 million 5.25-year Eurobond issue that has a coupon of 3.949%.

Alison Swonnell Named Global Head of Institutional Marketing at Fidelity International

Alison Swonnell was hired on as Global Head of Institutional Marketing at Fidelity International. She will be based in London and report to Chuch McKenzie, the firm’s global head of institutional clients. Before Fidelity, Swonnell was Director of Fund Operations for LCM Partners, an alternative investment management firm.

NY Governor Cuomo Seeks to Treat Carried Interest as Ordinary Income for State Taxes

On January 18, 2018, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo revealed he had submitted a bill to the New York State Legislature that seeks to treat carried interest as ordinary income rather than capital gains in regard to state taxes. Governor Cuomo in his press release said that the federal carried interest tax provision costs New York roughly US$ 100 million per year.

William Bain – Bain Founder Passes Away

Dated January 18, 2018, William Bain Jr. passed away at his home in Naples, Florida at the age of 80. Bain started at the Boston Consulting Group and left in 1973 to form Boston-based Bain & Co. By 1984, Bain formed Bain Capital alongside a number of colleagues including former 2012 Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney. In a statement to the Boston Globe, Romney said, ” It’s hard for me to imagine my life and career without Bill Bain’s mentoring.”

Prostar Capital Gets Controlling Stake in Socar Aurora Fujairah Terminal

Prostar Capital now has a 90% control stake in Socar Aurora Fujairah Terminal FZC by purchasing 100% of the shares of Socar Aurora Terminals S.A. The Prostar Capital entities investing in the asset are Prostar Asia-Pacific Energy Infrastructure Fund and a co-investment fund managed by Prostar Capital for a large U.S. state pension plan. The storage terminals acquired in the Port of Fujairah in the United Arab Emirates.

Socar Aurora Fujairah Terminal FZC is a joint venture between State Oil Company of Azerbaijan Republic (SOCAR), Swiss-based commodity trader AURORA Progress, and the Government of Fujairah.

Prostar Capital started buying the terminal back in 2013 at 18.6%. The private equity firm eventually moved its ownership up to 40% on August 14, 2015.

Continue Reading

ISIF Plans to Back 20 Solar Farms in Ireland



The Ireland Strategic Investment Fund (ISIF) and Hamburg-based Capital Stage, a solar and wind park operator, are financially backing the development of 20 solar farms in Ireland which has an estimated cost at €140 million. ISIF is funding 25% of the costs, with Capital Stage providing 75% of the costs.

The generation capacity is estimated at 140 MW, with each farm ranging between 5 MW to 25 MW. The majority of the solar farms will be located along the east and south-west coasts of Ireland. Power Capital, a Dublin-based energy company formed by Peter Duff and Justin Brown in 2011, is overseeing the developments.

Continue Reading

PNB to Buy Stake from Malaysian Developers in Battersea Power Station Project



Malaysia-based Permodalan Nasional Bhd (PNB) inked plans to acquire a stake in the Battersea Power Station from Malaysian developers Sime Darby Property and SP Setia, which between them own 80 percent of the site located on the south bank of the Thames. [ Content protected for Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute Standard subscribers only. Please subscribe to view content. ]

Continue Reading


© 2008-2018 Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute. All Rights Reserved. Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute ® and SWFI® are registered trademarks of the Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute. Other third-party content, logos and trademarks are owned by their perspective entities and used for informational purposes only. No affiliation or endorsement, express or implied, is provided by their use. All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. Registration on or use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms of use agreement which includes our privacy policy. Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute (SWFI) is a global organization designed to study sovereign wealth funds, pensions, endowments, superannuation funds, family offices, central banks and other long-term institutional investors in the areas of investing, asset allocation, risk, governance, economics, policy, trade and other relevant issues. SWFI facilitates sovereign fund, pension, endowment, superannuation fund and central bank events around the world. SWFI is a minority-owned organization.